這次看的也是哲學入門書,但所介紹的主要是哲學家及主要思想其書分3部份:哲人,哲思,哲語
哲人介紹了柏拉圖,尼采,維根斯坦,沙特及羅蒂5位哲學家的簡單觀念
哲語是陳永明的一些對語言邏輯,倫理及通識的看法
最精彩的我認為是中間哲思一部分
裡面介紹了存在主義,語言哲學,真假觀及主客觀等哲學方向
存在主義中
祈克果認為人怎樣面對自由的責任?最理想的人生是如何
尼采宣稱上帝已死--沒了一位生命的立法者,人如何負起責任及主宰自己?
加謬在<西西弗斯的神話>中,如何快樂面對人生的荒謬-無意義的工作?
沙特在<存在與虛無>中,如何以"沒有"分析人的存在與本質?
韋根思坦認為哲學與日常語言的關係何如?
真假能否以苻合論,調協論或實驗主義來定論?或由其他方法?或根本沒所謂真?
由洛克分別主次要物性,巴克萊認為實體是質性綜合否定物主體
到休謨否定自我主體及因果,人只是由感受合成,因果不必然
是否一切都就可以否定呢?
雖然說得不深入,也沒有作出怎樣的解答
但作為決定要不要深入探究的指標,這是一很不錯的簡介
學習哲學先要提出問題,最終為了解決問題
1 則留言:
It is also a philosophical introducing book which I read, but it is mainly introducing the philosopher and their throught.
This book have been divided into 3 parts:哲人,哲思,哲語
哲人 have a brief introduction of 5 significant philosophers: Plato, Nietzsche, Wittgenstein, Sartre,
哲思 is some personal thinking by 陳永明 on linguistic logic, ethic and liberal education.
哲語 is the best part midst the book I think, it contain some ideology such as existentialism, linguistic philosophy, The view of Truth & False, Subjective and Oubjective.
Within existentialism:
From Kierkegaard's thought: How people face to his responsibility of freedom? What is the ideal life of humankind?
Nietzsche announce that the god was dead--How did people carry the responsibility and dominate himself without the the "legislator of life"?
In Camus's "The Myth of Sisyphus": How can we happily face to the Absurd Life- the meaningless job?
In Sartre's "being and Nothingness": How he analyze human's being and essence by "Nothingness?
What is the relationship Wittgenstein think between basis language and philosophy?
Although that are all not be deeply expounded and come without an answer, it is also a fine introduction to be a indicator deciding whether should I take a thorough study on it.
Bring up a question is advance of Learning Philosophy, and in end up in solve the question.
張貼留言